Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Annelin Bakker vs Yasmin Ezzat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bakker vs Ezzat analysis and find out who is favored!
Annelin Bakker vs Yasmin Ezzat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bakker 2 - 0 Ezzat
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bakker has won 39.81% of points on his second serve, while Ezzat has won 42.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bakker, in recent form, has won 61.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ezzat has won 54.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.08% and 39.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bakker has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ezzat has saved 49.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bakker has won 60% of matches played (W/L 18/ 12), with Ezzat winning 44.68% (W/L 21/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bakker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 12/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 7/ 8). Ezzat has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 53/ 38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 44/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Bakker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Ezzat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.5% of matches (W/L 19/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bakker winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Bakker winning 4 and Ezzat winning 2. The last match between Bakker and Ezzat was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 22-02-2024, Second, Hard with Annelin Bakker getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bakker and Ezzat have played a deciding set 2 times, with Bakker winning 2 times and Ezzat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bakker winning 0, and Ezzat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bakker has played against opponents with an average rank of 132.43 while Ezzat has played against players with an average rank of 126.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bakker has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ezzat has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bakker has converted 49.01% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ezzat has converted 49.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
898
Rank
898
High
19
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
797
Rank
680
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
56% (19-15)
Career Total W/L
51% (97-93)
62% (8-5)
YTD W/L
31% (4-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Annelin Bakker | Yasmin Ezzat |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 29 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:30 | 1:54:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (93/141) | 51% (83/162) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (59/93) | 65% (54/83) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (25/48) | 35% (28/79) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (12/18) | 47% (7/15) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (80/162) | 40% (57/141) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Annelin Bakker
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 2-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
50%
(
48 of
96)
3
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Annelin Bakker | Yasmin Ezzat |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (8/5) | 31% (4/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (19/12) | 39% (12/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (166/121) | 44% (125/160) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 31% (4/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 19 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 43 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:27 | 1:54:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 137.38 | 265.85 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (625/877) | 57% (529/920) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (376/625) | 60% (316/529) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (103/252) | 42% (164/390) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (63/122) | 45% (43/96) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (422/855) | 42% (378/908) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (8/5) | 33% (4/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (8/13) | 33% (4/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 57% (7/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 43% (7/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Annelin Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rinko Matsuda
Player
Annelin Bakker
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
54
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrienn Nagy
Player
Annelin Bakker
66%
(
73 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
76 of
117)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
34%
(
13 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
10 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
52%
(
58 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
66 of
117)
119
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Lavinia Tanasie
72%
(
103 of
144)
1st Serve %
73%
(
97 of
132)
0
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
2
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
53 of
97)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
48%
(
69 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
67 of
132)
142
Total Points Won
134
|
6-3 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Laura Cilekova
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Annelin Bakker
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Melanie Klaffner
89%
(
56 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
46 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Aminata Sall
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaella Krajicek
Player
Annelin Bakker
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Yasmin Ezzat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
78%
(
79 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diana Demidova
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ioana Zvonaru
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
87)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
40%
(
18 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jana Hossam Salah
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
98)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Elina Zakharova
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Francesca Pace
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena-Teodora Cadar
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bakker Vs Ezzat Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
